# Assessing Leveraged Yield Position

### Case1) Borrow $35 USDT against $100 stTON-USDT LP token

* parameter
  * Risk Factor : TON - 40%, USDT - 0%, LST - 5%, <mark style="color:orange;">LP - 5%</mark>
  * MaxRiskRatio : 80%, MaxLeverage : 300%

| Asset                         | Supply   | Borrow  | Net Asset | Risk Value |
| ----------------------------- | -------- | ------- | --------- | ---------- |
| **DeFi position (A = a1+a2)** | -        | -       | -         | -          |
| DEX (a1)                      | $100     | -       | $100      | $5         |
| Liquid Staking (a2)           | $50      | -       | $50       | $2.5       |
| **TON (B = b1 + b2)**         | $50      | -       | $50       | $20        |
| Native (b1)                   | -        | -       | -         | -          |
| DeFi position (b2, from A)    | $50      | -       | -         | -          |
| **USDT (C = c1 + c2)**        | **$50**  | $35     | $15       | **$0**     |
| Native (c1)                   | -        | $35     | -         | -          |
| DeFi position (c2, from A)    | $50      | -       | -         | -          |
| **Total Value (B + C)**       | **$100** | **$35** | **$65**   | **$27.5**  |

* Risk status
  * Risk ratio = $27.5 / $65 = 42% ≤ MaxRiskRatio ⇒ OK
  * Leverage = $100 / $65 = 154% ≤ MaxLeverage ⇒ OK

### Case2) Building Delta-neutral LP position

{% hint style="info" %}
step1) Alice wants to provide liquidity to the TON-USDT pair but aims to minimize value fluctuations caused by TON price changes. To achieve this, she balances the amount of TON($66 value) in the $100 of LP with the borrowing amount.
{% endhint %}

| Asset                         | Supply   | Borrow  | Net Asset | Risk Value |
| ----------------------------- | -------- | ------- | --------- | ---------- |
| **DeFi position (A = a1+a2)** | -        | -       | -         | -          |
| DEX (a1)                      | $100     |         | $100      | $5         |
| Liquid Staking (a2)           | -        |         | -         | -          |
| **TON (B = b1 + b2)**         | **$50**  | $66     | **-$16**  | **$6.4**   |
| Native (b1)                   | -        | $66     | -         | -          |
| DeFi position (b2, from A)    | $50      | -       | -         | -          |
| **USDT (C = c1 + c2)**        | **$50**  |         | $50       | **$0**     |
| Native (c1)                   | -        |         | -         | -          |
| DeFi position (c2, from A)    | $50      |         | -         | -          |
| **Total Value (B + C)**       | **$100** | **$66** | **$34**   | **$11.4**  |

* Risk status
  * Risk ratio = $11.4 / $34 = 33.5% ≤ MaxRiskRatio ⇒ OK
  * Leverage = $100 / $34 = 295% ≤ MaxLeverage ⇒ OK

{% hint style="info" %}
step2) Half of the borrowed TON is swapped for USDT and supplied back to the DEX as liquidity. The resulting $66 worth of LP tokens is then used as collateral to borrow additional TON.
{% endhint %}

| Asset                         | Supply   | Borrow   | Net Asset | Risk Value |
| ----------------------------- | -------- | -------- | --------- | ---------- |
| **DeFi position (A = a1+a2)** | -        | -        | -         | -          |
| DEX (a1)                      | $100+$66 | -        | $166      | $8.3       |
| Liquid Staking (a2)           | -        | -        | -         | -          |
| **TON (B = b1 + b2)**         | **$83**  | $110     | **-$27**  | **$10.8**  |
| Native (b1)                   | -        | $66+$44  | -         | -          |
| DeFi position (b2, from A)    | $83      | -        | -         | -          |
| **USDT (C = c1 + c2)**        | **$83**  |          | $83       | **$0**     |
| Native (c1)                   | -        |          | -         | -          |
| DeFi position (c2, from A)    | $83      |          | -         | -          |
| **Total Value (B + C)**       | **$175** | **$110** | **$56**   | **$19.1**  |

{% hint style="info" %}
step3) By repeating the previous process, Alice ends up with $200 worth of LP tokens and $100 worth of borrowed TON, creating a position that is neutral to TON price movements.

\[Disclaimer] Due to the nature of the DEX LP, the composition of the LP changes as TON price fluctuates, perfect neutrality is unattainable. Instead, this strategy allows for a position with significantly reduced sensitivity to price changes.
{% endhint %}

### Case3) Leveraging LP position

{% hint style="info" %}
step1) Bob wants to build leveraged LP position by supplying $100 of TON-USDT LP token. Then the user borrowed $33 of TON and USDT each.
{% endhint %}

| Asset                         | Supply   | Borrow  | Net Asset | Risk Value |
| ----------------------------- | -------- | ------- | --------- | ---------- |
| **DeFi position (A = a1+a2)** | -        | -       | -         | -          |
| DEX (a1)                      | $100     | -       | $100      | $5         |
| Liquid Staking (a2)           | -        | -       | -         | -          |
| **TON (B = b1 + b2)**         | **$50**  | $33     | **$17**   | **$6.8**   |
| Native (b1)                   | -        | $33     | -         | -          |
| DeFi position (b2, from A)    | $50      | -       | -         | -          |
| **USDT (C = c1 + c2)**        | **$50**  | $33     | $17       | **$0**     |
| Native (c1)                   | -        | $33     | -         | -          |
| DeFi position (c2, from A)    | $50      | -       | -         | -          |
| **Total Value (B + C)**       | **$100** | **$66** | **$34**   | **$11.8**  |

* Risk status
  * Risk ratio = $11.8 / $34 = 35% ≤ MaxRiskRatio ⇒ OK
  * Leverage = $100 / $34 = 294% ≤ MaxLeverage ⇒ OK

{% hint style="info" %}
step2) Borrowed assets can be used as liquidity provision to DEX, minting $66 worth of LP tokens. This LP tokens can then be used as collateral to borrow additional assets.

If Bob repeats this process, he could provide liquidity up to times the initial invested capital.
{% endhint %}

| Asset                         | Supply   | Borrow   | Net Asset | Risk Value |
| ----------------------------- | -------- | -------- | --------- | ---------- |
| **DeFi position (A = a1+a2)** | -        | -        | -         | -          |
| DEX (a1)                      | $292     | -        | $292      | $14.6      |
| Liquid Staking (a2)           | -        | -        | -         | -          |
| **TON (B = b1 + b2)**         | **$146** | $97      | **$49**   | **$19.6**  |
| Native (b1)                   | -        | $97      | -         | -          |
| DeFi position (b2, from A)    | $146     | -        | -         | -          |
| **USDT (C = c1 + c2)**        | **$146** | $97      | $49       | **$0**     |
| Native (c1)                   | -        | $97      | -         | -          |
| DeFi position (c2, from A)    | $146     | -        | -         | -          |
| **Total Value (B + C)**       | **$292** | **$194** | **$98**   | **$34.2**  |

* Risk status
  * Risk ratio = $34.2 / $98 = 35% ≤ MaxRiskRatio ⇒ OK
  * Leverage = $292 / $98 = 298% ≤ MaxLeverage ⇒ OK


---

# Agent Instructions: Querying This Documentation

If you need additional information that is not directly available in this page, you can query the documentation dynamically by asking a question.

Perform an HTTP GET request on the current page URL with the `ask` query parameter:

```
GET https://docs.affluent.org/factorial-legacy/account-risk/assessing-leveraged-yield-position.md?ask=<question>
```

The question should be specific, self-contained, and written in natural language.
The response will contain a direct answer to the question and relevant excerpts and sources from the documentation.

Use this mechanism when the answer is not explicitly present in the current page, you need clarification or additional context, or you want to retrieve related documentation sections.